<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Squidoo? Why??</title>
	<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22</link>
	<description>What I Read; What I Have Read; and stuff I pick up and drag along</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: JCG</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-35022</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-35022</guid>
					<description>I had a problem uploading images too. Today The images wouldnt show up for me in after uploading, posting saving or anything. Very frusterating. It makes me want to give up on this stupid site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a problem uploading images too. Today The images wouldnt show up for me in after uploading, posting saving or anything. Very frusterating. It makes me want to give up on this stupid site.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Tietze</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-6</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 19:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-6</guid>
					<description>Seth - thanks for your answers. (Wow! The man himself - hang on, I'm just having a moment... OK. Done.)

Ad 1 - What good would a lens about me be? And there's already a site with my best posts -- It's here. No, actually that's not true. This blog doesn't give you my publication list, my Ph.D. thesis, my CV, etc. So perhaps there IS a need for a lens about lil' ol' me.  Though I doubt it.

Ad 2 - But on the Web I'll hopefully find infos from sources I trust, e.g. reputable magazines. Not just someone who &quot;claimed&quot; squidoo.com/trustmeimaprofessional Also, with a wealth of sources I can try and get a &quot;fair and balanced&quot; overview [albeit we both know that that's probably not the case, since too much information is just as bad as none at all].

Ad 3 - Here, in a way, I agree. We currently have a lot of distributed content being produced on dispersed sites. And we have the aggregators - your digg, slashdot, reddit, whatever. We have a lot of regurgitatiing, reblogging, digging, bookmarking, etc. The only other place I can think of where new and interesting content is developed by a large community of people is the one I mentioned - Wikipedia. (I don't buy the &quot;for free&quot; part, though -- blogger.com is free, so is Yahoo 360 and a whole host of others more).

All the technical squabbles aside, I think my main cristicism is that Squidoo doesn't feel like a community effort. It feels like a school science fair, with a single nerd sitting in each booth with his pet beetles under a magnifying lens or with his collection of soda bottle tops. That, and the fact that Squidoo doesn't tempt me to explore. So my TWO main criticisms are ... (Google for &quot;Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition&quot; for the logical conclusion to this paragraph). 

So perhaps you can find a way to strengthen the community aspect -- maybe with hosted discussion forums, a comments or feedback component? Also - there's not always the one truth. So where would I go if I have a dissenting opinion about something? Somebody claims squidoo.com/daniels_an_idiot and fills it with lots of information about why I'm an idiot. I can set up a parallel lens squidoo.com/no_im_not but unless he links it in his &quot;related lenses&quot; (which he probably won't, since he thinks I'm an idiot anyway), how would people find my counter-arguments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth - thanks for your answers. (Wow! The man himself - hang on, I&#8217;m just having a moment&#8230; OK. Done.)</p>
<p>Ad 1 - What good would a lens about me be? And there&#8217;s already a site with my best posts &#8212; It&#8217;s here. No, actually that&#8217;s not true. This blog doesn&#8217;t give you my publication list, my Ph.D. thesis, my CV, etc. So perhaps there IS a need for a lens about lil&#8217; ol&#8217; me.  Though I doubt it.</p>
<p>Ad 2 - But on the Web I&#8217;ll hopefully find infos from sources I trust, e.g. reputable magazines. Not just someone who &#8220;claimed&#8221; squidoo.com/trustmeimaprofessional Also, with a wealth of sources I can try and get a &#8220;fair and balanced&#8221; overview [albeit we both know that that&#8217;s probably not the case, since too much information is just as bad as none at all].</p>
<p>Ad 3 - Here, in a way, I agree. We currently have a lot of distributed content being produced on dispersed sites. And we have the aggregators - your digg, slashdot, reddit, whatever. We have a lot of regurgitatiing, reblogging, digging, bookmarking, etc. The only other place I can think of where new and interesting content is developed by a large community of people is the one I mentioned - Wikipedia. (I don&#8217;t buy the &#8220;for free&#8221; part, though &#8212; blogger.com is free, so is Yahoo 360 and a whole host of others more).</p>
<p>All the technical squabbles aside, I think my main cristicism is that Squidoo doesn&#8217;t feel like a community effort. It feels like a school science fair, with a single nerd sitting in each booth with his pet beetles under a magnifying lens or with his collection of soda bottle tops. That, and the fact that Squidoo doesn&#8217;t tempt me to explore. So my TWO main criticisms are &#8230; (Google for &#8220;Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition&#8221; for the logical conclusion to this paragraph). </p>
<p>So perhaps you can find a way to strengthen the community aspect &#8212; maybe with hosted discussion forums, a comments or feedback component? Also - there&#8217;s not always the one truth. So where would I go if I have a dissenting opinion about something? Somebody claims squidoo.com/daniels_an_idiot and fills it with lots of information about why I&#8217;m an idiot. I can set up a parallel lens squidoo.com/no_im_not but unless he links it in his &#8220;related lenses&#8221; (which he probably won&#8217;t, since he thinks I&#8217;m an idiot anyway), how would people find my counter-arguments?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: seth godin</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-5</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 15:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-5</guid>
					<description>thanks for trying it out, Daniel.

I have three answers as to why you'd want to use Squidoo:

1. the world needs a lens about your blog. Your best posts. A place to start if I just found out about you. You could even list your favorite books, etc., as a service to those that admire your opinions.

2. Do a google search to try to compare skype with net2phone. You'll find tons and tons of matches, but not one useful page (at least I didn't.) But if someone built a lens on this, the answer would be right there.

3. Which leads to the proximity effect. Each lens is generating traffic... some have a lot. The net effect is that more people visit squidoo every day than gm.com or ford.com. If someone wants to put in the effort to customize and maintain a blog, more power to them. For everyone else, though, it feels like Squidoo offers a chance to stake a tiny piece of cyberspace, for free.

One last thing: 15 weeks after blogging started, blogs were pretty bad. I think our lensmasters are doing some great work given how young our site is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for trying it out, Daniel.</p>
<p>I have three answers as to why you&#8217;d want to use Squidoo:</p>
<p>1. the world needs a lens about your blog. Your best posts. A place to start if I just found out about you. You could even list your favorite books, etc., as a service to those that admire your opinions.</p>
<p>2. Do a google search to try to compare skype with net2phone. You&#8217;ll find tons and tons of matches, but not one useful page (at least I didn&#8217;t.) But if someone built a lens on this, the answer would be right there.</p>
<p>3. Which leads to the proximity effect. Each lens is generating traffic&#8230; some have a lot. The net effect is that more people visit squidoo every day than gm.com or ford.com. If someone wants to put in the effort to customize and maintain a blog, more power to them. For everyone else, though, it feels like Squidoo offers a chance to stake a tiny piece of cyberspace, for free.</p>
<p>One last thing: 15 weeks after blogging started, blogs were pretty bad. I think our lensmasters are doing some great work given how young our site is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Daniel Tietze</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-4</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 06:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-4</guid>
					<description>Yes, I did. I published it several times, deleted the photo, re-uploaded it, changed the scale of the photo, uploaded again, published, etc. 
Maybe there's a size restriction I'm not aware of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I did. I published it several times, deleted the photo, re-uploaded it, changed the scale of the photo, uploaded again, published, etc.<br />
Maybe there&#8217;s a size restriction I&#8217;m not aware of?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Heath Row</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-3</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 22:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/squidoo-why/22#comment-3</guid>
					<description>Curious: After uploading your photo, did you Publish your lens? If you haven't, changes won't show up in the live, published page. They will, however, show up in the edit view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Curious: After uploading your photo, did you Publish your lens? If you haven&#8217;t, changes won&#8217;t show up in the live, published page. They will, however, show up in the edit view.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
