<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Graham - LISP fanboy extraordinaire</title>
	<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/paul-graham-lisp-fanboy-extraordinaire/35</link>
	<description>What I Read; What I Have Read; and stuff I pick up and drag along</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Claudiu</title>
		<link>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/paul-graham-lisp-fanboy-extraordinaire/35#comment-119561</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.go4teams.com/archives/paul-graham-lisp-fanboy-extraordinaire/35#comment-119561</guid>
					<description>I know this was 3 years ago, but there have been studies showing a given programmer writes the same number of lines of productive code a day, on average, regardless of the language. So if you are a super-productive C programmer and can write 200 lines of C code, once you switch to Python and become used to it, you'll be able to write 200 lines of Python code a day. Since you can do more in 200 lines of Python than in C, you will be more productive. There is merit to this argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this was 3 years ago, but there have been studies showing a given programmer writes the same number of lines of productive code a day, on average, regardless of the language. So if you are a super-productive C programmer and can write 200 lines of C code, once you switch to Python and become used to it, you&#8217;ll be able to write 200 lines of Python code a day. Since you can do more in 200 lines of Python than in C, you will be more productive. There is merit to this argument.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
